• AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I would love to have a good pair of ar glasses to play games on my Steam Deck with. Connect a controller, and not have to hold up the heavy Deck itself.

    But given Apple’s propensity for walled gardens and lock-in, and Meta putting manipulative spyware into everything they make, these hypothetical glasses won’t be coming from either of those companies.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’d be a little more enthused if both companies main goal from this wasn’t to make us work while wearing them.

  • pachrist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I think this is a case where the imagination is much, much better than the reality.

    For the mobilization of technology, miniaturization has had a lot of benefits, not just in the technology, but in the accessibility. Having a desktop computer instead of a mainframe was huge. It brought the computer to the home. Laptops becoming viable was huge again. It untethered the computer from the wall. For most of the planet, we’re still in the midst of the massive leap that is smart phones. It put a computer in the pocket of billions of people.

    Beating that is hard. Smart phones are the most accessible, most powerful devices most end users have ever used. We take that for granted, and we take the time it took to get there for granted. It took 25 years of desktops to get real, decent laptops (personally, I’d say mid 90s). It took 25 of laptops to get real, decent smartphones (again personally, I’d say ~2010ish).

    Like it or not, we have another decade to go probably before the technology is there for the next evolution in personal computing. But the problem we have really is that there’s not another leap as far as accessibility is concerned. Smart phones work places where laptops can’t. Laptops work places where desktops can’t. Desktops work places where mainframes can’t. Smart phones can work anywhere. Taking the computer from the datacenter, to the home, to your backpack, to your pocket is huge. Is the next step from the pocket to your wrist? To your face? Is it worth it? Is it really that much better?

  • alehel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I don’t want ads thrown into my eyeballs. So that’s a big no from me.

    • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 minutes ago

      I agree with you fully. It’s a sad state that we can’t even imagine wearable glasses tech without invasive ads

  • 13igTyme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Google already made AR glasses and they failed. Not because the product was bad, but because AR is stupid and has such a niche case that it’s practically worthless.

  • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I think the fundamental problem with the AR glasses is something that can’t be overcome.

    I think its easy to see the utility to owning a pair of glasses that look good and provide real time information as desired for what you are looking at or hearing.

    HOWEVER, I think very few people will want the product these co.panies will make. This will be a method to throw ads literally in front of your eyeballs. Enshitification is too big of a thing now and so any new product is tainted by the expectation it will rapidly turn to garbage at a high price to you.

    Also, while we may think we can be trusted, we dont trust anyone else having all that info, I dont like the obvious privacy implications that these can present. Filming with them is also terrifying.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah my best guess is that at most these will at best lead to homebrew and specialist uses. For example I have to wear glasses my astigmatism is rather severe so contacts don’t work, so if I could attach a small projector to my glasses and put my phones display onto it I would have so many uses.

    • Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      You might be giving people too much credit here because the same things could be said about a lot of products and services that have come out over the last 10 years

      • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        50 minutes ago

        😆 And here I was think I wasn’t giving anyone any credit. I just proclaimed none of us could be trusted!

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      How is Quest a flop? Or are you talking about something else?

      Bot quest and ray band products are huge success dominating their respective markets.

      I really wish people were more serious about these markets so it can be done well from the get got rather than starting to be fixed and regulated 2 decades later.

      • Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Having borrowed a quest 3 last week I’ve almost pulled trigger on buying one.

        The only thing holding me back is… it’s Meta.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          If you get one, buy Walkabout Mini Golf. I’ve spent so long playing that and hanging out in its worlds.

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          There’s a big piracy scene on Quest so if you really put in the effort you’re not giving these evil assholes much but generally I agree. There’s so much entertainment and things to do that I can really wait a bit longer as VR is not going away.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    There are a lot of things at Apple that I, as the paying customer, would rather Cook care more about than AR/VR boondoggles.

      • MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s a still frame from Star Trek The Next Generation, episode The Game

        The plot is a wearable device that is an AR “glasses” game that as you play the game it “makes you feel good” gets used to take over the Enterprise so terrorists can hijack it.

        At the time I imagine it was intended to be part of anti-drug campaigns with the AR and companies curating what you see to distract from reality angle/sentiment being more relevant today