• Señor Mono@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The prices are the way they are because it is real wool, which doesn’t grow on trees. If I take a look at other wool pullovers/sweaters from other companies they range from 80-130€ some peeking at about 200€.

    So it is that particular material and thus product, not the company that is pricy.

    • ramble81@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      So I don’t quite get your “grow on trees” analogy. They just grow on sheep instead, and require harvesting like they would from a tree, and require food and care like trees. And it’s not like you’re killing them off. So if anything, it’s almost exactly like “growing on trees”

      • Señor Mono@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Cotton is cheaper. It grows on trees plants, which implicate better availability and easier procurement.

        • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          Despite it’s German name Baumwolle, cotton doesn’t grow on trees, like e.g. Kapok does, but on plants which makes it easier to harvest.

          • Señor Mono@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Okay. Plants instead of trees. It was a false friend, thanks for pointing out. Striked tree out for good measure.