If your routes aren’t changing, then your device, as a client, isn’t going to reach anything. You’ll need to see a route for the 10.20.0.0/24 subnet show up that points to whatever the endpoint address is on the other end.

Nope, none shows up. I am looking via ip route, right?

So if that’s all your server config is, it’s only going to allow one peer at a time. You can confirm this by disconnecting your android device from the tunnel, and then connecting using the same info from your Linux device.

Just looked up the config created by opnsense. You were right. I had to restart wireguard to update the config file so that my other peers (like this debian machine) could connect. Thank’s for helping me out!

You also at a minimum should have PostUP and PostDown directives to properly forward incoming traffic on your wg interface.

That is hopefully managed by NetworkManager, isn’t?

1. my routes doesn’t change: default via 192.168.66.110 dev wlP6p1s0 proto dhcp src 192.168.66.211 metric 600 and 192.168.66.0/24 dev wlP6p1s0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.66.211 metric 600.
2. After some seconds I can access the internet but not my subnet IPs I should be able to ping. So I was wondering if I am even using my VPN connection. I can observe my outgoing connections on my opnsense (but not when doing this on my computer, the device in question).
3. It just contains:

[Peer]
PublicKey = X
Endpoint = IP:NondefaultPort
AllowedIPs = 0.0.0.0\0,::/0

My tunnel address should be 10.200.0.13/32 once connected.

Yes. Then I imported said config additionally via nmcli connection import type wireguard file /etc/wireguard/wg0.conf which may be duplication.

Projects are receiving issues about WSL compatibility issues. So this directly influences FOSS projects.

They would go as far as put bounties for PRs just to get more hold in the community. Just swapping to a permissive license appears to be enough to get contributions.

They can keep their secrets; I won’t ever check this repository out.

Does Lemmy even know what EEE means anymore or are we regurgitating words we heard from some article now?

So either all people of lemmy don’t know shit (you are not included here - implied) or only your assumption is valid: Wrong sources.

What’s it going to embrace and extend?

It embraces the Linux ecosystem and DX on windows. Microsoft is extending the Linux kernel and other Linux projects.

WSL has existed for ages and is just a way to run Linux in a convenient container on top of Windows. That’s it.

To you, yes. Can you speak for any project? Is there not a single project where the userbase are consisting of WSL users with compatability issues? Did you research about it? If so, prompt sources.

It’s not an attempt to “extenguish” Linux, literally just make the development experience on Windows less painful so people don’t switch to another OS. This has nothing to do with EEE.

Trying to bundle the userbase in their subsystem is literally rendering a dedicated Linux machine obsolete. If all would stay there the rest of the distro community would extinguish.

Open sourcing it with a permissive license can only be a good thing,

Can it? Contributing substracts work hours from other projects. So “only be a good thing” is wrong. There are more perspectives then just yours.

and again they’re doing it to be more appealing to devs and maybe get free bug fixes from the open source community.

You got sources about their intentions? You just said it: They are conquering the labor market of personal devs.

It isn’t some grand conspiracy. But of course this community will react to news of “proprietary blob is now open source” with pessimism.

Did you already review the code? No concerns left? How about pulling private servers for data? Is everything mirrored onto their servers? Any binary blobs there? Tracking/monitoring? Is it safe in regards of privacy and security?

Hopefully you see that you ain’t holding all answers and opinions of the entire world. Cheers.

I’ll be honest, this sounds interesting, but I have no idea what you’re even trying to say.

I am just sharing for the community. And I want some nerdish engagement tbqh.

Where does the $2700 price come from?

It was the manufacture price when I purchased it.

Does it support Linux or not?

It does but there are a few important things lacking. Also it isn’t stable without reading up on LKMS upfront and knowing what to do. Not all distros are capable of booting it yet (e.g. void).

Are you happy with it or not?

I poured ~$1200 to Qualcomm/Lenovo and they are employing one worker from one sub company. Interpret it on your own.

What’s LKMS?

RTFM. // Edit: I missspelled. LKML. I edited my post. Appreciated.

I’m really struggling to even parse the basics from your post.

I am open for sharing my insights, though : )