Very interesting. Fixing one of the most common flaws of LLMs. If you can force them to follow proper structure they can generate better batch of test data samples, correct mathematical proofs in Lean, proper conlang words and sentences, proper json output for latter use by another tools, and obviously correct code generation in a specific version of a programming language.

From latin: populus Rōmānus

In french could be peuple romain for example

I am non-american and pedantic though not pretentious, be it a counterexample *_*

People roman ?

Yeah I read it Pull request first time lmao

Depends where you’re from

To answer your question, It is safe to assume most people read the title and the abstract but don’t actually read the article

On what basis do you suppose one is worse than the other? I think both are

While you’re right. It would be better to say something like “I need it for my country” or “US needs it”. Since English doesn’t distinguish between inclusive and exclusive “we”, it can lead to the conclusion that the commenter supposes people reading their comment are from US as well.

Thanks !

You’re the one bringing a fact, you’re the one supposed to source it. Anyway, your source doesn’t talk about any increase of prevalence, how can we know there’s a crisis from your source? Could be just that we diagnose more cases these times (or even the same digits, since we don’t have evolution data in your source). Even worse: your source literally state Digital media as a means of preventing mental health issues by spreading educative content. Nowhere does your source state that digital media is THE cause of the young mental health “crisis”.

What does the PR acronym stand for ?

Why do US citizens think everyone on the internet is from their country ?

So you agree with some part ?

What mental health crisis?

This doesn’t make sense. Forbidding social media is as stupid as forbidding video games, it’s old people not trying to find the real cause and instead passing measures which will be completely useless. Social media doesn’t necessarily mean Meta

exactly

cringe

Any kind of person can be in that group probably. Gamers isn’t an ideology or homogeneous group

You are, judging by your comment

Because you’re using it wrong. It’s good for generative text and chains of thought, not symbolic calculations including math or linguistics