1. Have you read the post?

2. If you’d like to refute the content on the grounds of another scientist, can you please provide a reference? I will read it

I don’t think this answers the question

What would Altman gain from overstating the environmental impact of his own company?

You should consider the possibility that CEOs of big companies essentially always think very hard about how to talk about everything so that it always benefits them

I can see the benefits, I can try to explain if you’re actually interested

This isn’t my article and yes that’s controlled for

I actually think that (presently) self hosted LLMs are much worse for hallucination

Do you hold Sam Altman’s opinion higher than the reasoning here? In general or just on this particular take?

Thank you for your considered and articulate comment

What do you think about the significant difference in attitude between comments here and in (quite serious) programming communities like https://lobste.rs/s/bxixuu/cheat_sheet_for_why_using_chatgpt_is_not

Are we in different echo chambers? Is chatgpt a uniquely powerful tool for programmers? Is social media a fundamentally Luddite mechanism?

Every time I see a comment like this I lost a little more faith in lemmy

No it doesn’t