• Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t think this answers the question

    They’re specifically showing you that in the use case you asked about the assertions must change. Your question is bad for the case that you’re specifically asking about.

    So no, it doesn’t answer the question… But your question has a bunch more caveats that must be accounted for that you’re just straight up missing.

    • anus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      No that is not how reasoned debate works, you have to articulate your argument lest you’re just sloppily babbling talking points

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        If the premise of your argument is fundamentally flawed, then you’re not having a reasoned debate. You just a zealot.